Anubiki · infrastructure intelligence

Understand what exists.
Design what comes next.

One infrastructure intelligence platform, two strategic directions: AI Infrastructure Analyst for understanding and improving existing infrastructure, and AI Infrastructure Architect for designing and evolving it. Both build toward AI grounded in deterministic evidence; neither is generally available as an AI product today.

CONFIGCHECK · AVAILABLERISK GRAPH · ACTIVE DEVELOPMENTGUIDED DESIGN · PRODUCT DIRECTION
Two pillars · one evidence foundation

From understanding
to informed change.

These pillars describe where Anubiki is heading. Start today with supported tools or a scoped professional engagement; future AI functionality is product direction.

Existing infrastructure · strategic direction

AI Infrastructure Analyst

Understand, investigate, secure, and improve what you have.

Available today
ConfigCheck Free analyzes supported configuration evidence locally in your browser. Full Analysis is a scoped professional review available by inquiry.
In active development
Risk Graph connects normalized facts, deterministic relationships, and bounded security reasoning. Explore the synthetic demo; the full customer experience is not generally available as a self-service product.
Future AI direction · not generally available
Ask questions about infrastructure and explore improvements through explanations grounded in deterministic facts, provenance, and explicit uncertainty.
New and evolving infrastructure · strategic direction

AI Infrastructure Architect

Design, evaluate, and evolve infrastructure around real requirements.

Available by inquiry
Infrastructure Design is a scoped professional engagement. Start with your requirements, constraints, and goals; scope and deliverables are agreed separately.
Future AI direction · not generally available
Guided requirements gathering, architecture options, and tradeoff evaluation, with assumptions visible and proposed designs evaluated against supported deterministic evidence.
Shared foundation
Carry intent and design context toward understanding the delivered infrastructure. Automated design, validation, deployment, and monitoring workflows remain product direction.

Evidence precedes inference. Higher-level AI explanation must consume deterministic facts; missing evidence remains unknown. A policy permit or route alone does not prove reachability or exposure.

Start with your need

Tell us what you're trying
to accomplish.

You should not need to know the right firewall, access point, switching platform, camera system, or topology before asking for help. Start with the environment and the outcome.

YOUR REQUIREMENT
“We're opening a three-floor office for 20 employees and about 50 endpoints. We need reliable wireless, secure Internet access, cameras and remote access, with room to grow—but we need to control cost.”
3 floors20 users~50 endpointsWirelessSecurityCamerasCost conscious
DESIGN DIRECTION

Turn the need into choices.

Cost optimizedMeet the requirement with controlled spend.
Resilience firstPrioritize availability and operational headroom.

Compare architecture, technology choices, assumptions, estimated costs or quotes, security considerations, and an implementation path.

One connected lifecycle

Describe. Design. Decide.
Then carry the context forward.

01

Describe

Sites, users, endpoints, applications, security needs, budget, constraints, and goals.

02

Design

Translate requirements into architecture and technology options with visible assumptions.

03

Compare

Evaluate tradeoffs, costs, quotes, security posture, complexity, and room to grow.

04

Deploy

Carry the approved design into sourcing, implementation scope, and documentation.

05

Validate

Use evidence from the delivered infrastructure to verify what was actually built.

06

Understand

Connect configuration facts and relationships so security decisions retain their context.

Product direction: Automated guided design, sourcing, quoting, deployment, and lifecycle workflows are not generally available today. A scoped professional Infrastructure Design engagement can be initiated through the design brief. ConfigCheck Free is available now as a self-service local browser experience, and Risk Graph is in active development.

The intelligence foundation

Evidence becomes context.
Context becomes understanding.

Start with configuration evidence. Build infrastructure context. Then use relationships, boundaries, findings, and uncertainty to investigate why something matters.

CONFIGURATION→CONTEXT→INVESTIGATION
01

Configuration evidence

ConfigCheck turns supported Cisco IOS / IOS-XE, Juniper Junos set format, and Arista EOS configuration into normalized, inspectable facts—locally in the browser.

AVAILABLE NOWConfigCheckCheck your configuration
02

Infrastructure context

Interfaces, networks, routing domains, routes, ACLs, management bindings, zones, policies, and deterministic relationships become one evidence-backed model you can inspect.

SYNTHETIC EXPERIENCEInfrastructure AnalysisExplore the synthetic environment
03

Security intelligence

Risk Graph connects those facts to environment scope, boundaries, findings, uncertainty, declared peers, conditions, and scoped policy decisions so teams can investigate why a security condition matters.

CORE CAPABILITY · ACTIVE DEVELOPMENTRisk GraphExplore Risk Graph Demo

ConfigCheck Free is the self-service local browser experience. Anubiki Full Analysis is a scoped professional analysis/review available by inquiry, using currently supported capabilities. It does not include self-service access to the full customer Infrastructure Explorer / Risk Graph product experience, which remains in development and is not generally available as a self-service product. The separate synthetic environment demonstrates the broader experience.

Why the foundation matters

A design is an intention.
Evidence shows the system.

Anubiki's larger opportunity is to preserve context from the original requirement through architecture, implementation, and operation. Risk Graph is the developing intelligence layer for understanding how delivered infrastructure facts and security relationships actually fit together.

Keep requirements and assumptions visibleConnect configured facts to derived relationshipsMake ambiguity and incomplete evidence explicitLet security conclusions remain inspectable
Risk Graph · synthetic experience
EnvironmentNeighborhoodInvestigation
ENVIRONMENT
Routing contexts
Interfaces + networks
Controls + policy
SECURITY REASONING
Findings in context
Evidence limitations
Scoped decisions
Inspect entitiesFollow relationshipsOpen proofWithhold unsupported conclusions
Broader product direction

One infrastructure story.
Not disconnected tools.

The goal is continuity: what you asked for, why it was designed that way, what was selected, what was deployed, what the configuration proves, and what changes over time.

DIRECTION

Requirements & Design

Describe the need, develop architecture choices, compare tradeoffs, and work toward a design decision.

DIRECTION

Source & Deploy

Connect approved choices to quotes, sourcing, implementation scope, and deployment resources.

NOW + DEVELOPING

Understand & Secure

ConfigCheck, infrastructure evidence, and the developing Risk Graph reasoning experience.

DIRECTION

Validate & Monitor

Compare intended, delivered, and changing infrastructure state while preserving the original context.

Start with the requirement

What are you trying
to build?

Tell us about the site, users, endpoints, applications, security needs, budget, constraints, and what success looks like. Start with the need—not the equipment list.