Anubiki is being built to preserve context from organizational intent and requirements through architecture, design, implementation, and operation. It helps engineers and teams connect decisions with evidence, investigate security relationships, and carry that context into change and future evolution.
Infrastructure context spans requirements, architecture diagrams, design decisions, configurations, policies, routes, and operational tools. Teams build expertise across all of these; keeping the connections visible takes work.
Anubiki's direction is to preserve those connections across handoffs and changes, supporting the people who design, operate, and secure infrastructure with inspectable evidence and decision context.
Start with what you need, or start with what you have. Both should lead to the same infrastructure context.
Connect requirements, architecture choices, design, and implementation planning. Start today with a scoped professional Infrastructure Design engagement; guided requirements and automated design/build workflows remain product direction.
Start a design brief →Bring configuration evidence into your review with ConfigCheck Free or a scoped professional Full Analysis. Risk Graph is in development to connect relationships and security context; Ask Your Infrastructure and monitoring remain product direction.
Explore ConfigCheck Free →The goal is not another disconnected tool for each phase. It is infrastructure understanding that survives the handoff from an idea to an operating environment.
Available today: ConfigCheck Free provides local deterministic configuration analysis, with a separate synthetic infrastructure demo. Full Analysis and Infrastructure Design are scoped professional engagements by inquiry using currently supported capabilities. In active development: The full customer Infrastructure Explorer / Risk Graph experience is not generally available as a self-service product or included with professional Full Analysis. Guided requirements, automated design/build, Ask Your Infrastructure, and monitoring remain product direction.
Start with requirements, constraints, and intended outcomes. Preserve the rationale behind architecture and technology choices so teams can revisit decisions as needs change.
Configuration facts and deterministic relationships establish what the infrastructure actually supports. Missing context should remain visibly unknown.
Requirements and design decisions become more valuable when they survive implementation and can be compared with deployed reality, validation, and change.